By nature, people who are distributors of R&F are people who only started the skin care routine recently themselves. The nature of MLM means that most of the marketing copy and claims you see around the place for R&F are made by or interpreted and rewritten by people completely uneducated in skin care. Stop talking about the founders over and over again. Tell me about why your products are better than the rest. I don’t care if a product is hand crafted by Jesus himself, it does NOT mean it will work for me. Just because the two women who created the business are celebrity dermatologists, does not mean the products are automatically good for you. Here’s all the product ranges straight from their website just as an example:Ĭonflation of expertise grinds my gears. Ives Apricot Scrub and had never worn sunscreen until 2 weeks ago) suddenly sound like a dermatologist who’s just come back from an international conference on anti-ageing technologies and has forgotten how to speak using normal words. Seriously clinical words like ‘regimen’, ‘therapy’ and ‘cycle’ are clearly encouraged and litter their social profiles, websites, and distributor pages, making that girl who used to bully you in high school (and who definitely solely used St. The meaningless marketing buzzwords that appeal to emotion used names of the product lines goes against all my core values as a skin care education enthusiast. The R&F world is just so transparently sales-heavy. Rodan & Fields’ appeal to authority & questionable quality of recommendations As you rise in the ranks however, I think the claim of ignorance to the bad nature of the MLM model is harder to make as you see how recruitment is the focus of the business, not selling the products. I believe many are illusioned or under financial stress and have been preyed upon and sold a lie. I also don’t hold much against individual distributors of the product. They allow online shopping rather than forcing people to purchase only through distributors (but also, do distributors not worry that people will purchase online rather than through them, rendering them useless? anyway…). They’re not the worst MLM in terms of compensation or business practices by far. In terms of the company, I appreciate their focus on informing people on the basic importance of a skin care routine. From what I can tell, many of the products include active ingredients that I personally enjoy or can see the benefit in. They’re not innately dangerous or anything like that. I’ll start off by saying that I don’t actually have anything against the Rodan & Fields (R&F) skin care formulations themselves. The problem with Rodan & Fields specifically
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |